`gosh.Rd`

Function to create GOSH plots for objects of class `"rma"`

.

gosh(x, ...) # S3 method for rma gosh(x, subsets, progbar=TRUE, parallel="no", ncpus=1, cl=NULL, ...)

x | an object of class |
---|---|

subsets | optional integer to specify the number of subsets. |

progbar | logical to specify whether a progress bar should be shown (the default is |

parallel | character string to specify whether parallel processing should be used (the default is |

ncpus | integer to specify the number of processes to use in the parallel processing. |

cl | optional cluster to use if |

... | other arguments. |

The model specified via `x`

must be a model fitted with either the `rma.uni`

, `rma.mh`

, or `rma.peto`

function.

Olkin et al. (2012) proposed the GOSH (graphical display of study heterogeneity) plot, which is based on examining the results of a fixed-effects model in all possible subsets of size \(1, \ldots, k\) of the \(k\) studies included in a meta-analysis. In a homogeneous set of studies, the model estimates obtained this way should form a roughly symmetric, contiguous, and unimodal distribution. On the other hand, when the distribution is multimodal, then this suggests the presence of heterogeneity, possibly due to outliers and/or distinct subgroupings of studies. Plotting the estimates against some measure of heterogeneity (e.g., \(I^2\), \(H^2\), or the \(Q\)-statistic) can also help to reveal subclusters, which are indicative of heterogeneity. The same type of plot can be produced by first fitting a fixed-effects model with either the `rma.uni`

(using `method="FE"`

), `rma.mh`

, or `rma.peto`

functions and then passing the fitted model object to the `gosh`

function and then plotting the results.

For models fitted with the `rma.uni`

function (which may involve moderators and/or may be random/mixed-effects models), the idea underlying this type of plot can be generalized (Viechtbauer, 2021) by examining the distribution of all model coefficients, plotting them against each other, and against some measure of (residual) heterogeneity (including the estimate of \(\tau^2\)).

Note that for models without moderators, application of the method requires fitting a total of \(2^k - 1\) models, which could be an excessively large number when \(k\) is large. For example, for \(k=10\), there are only 1023 possible subsets, but for \(k=20\), this number already grows to 1048575. For even larger \(k\), it may become computationally infeasible to consider all possible subsets. Instead, we can then examine (a sufficiently large number of) random subsets.

By default, if the number of possible subsets is \(\le 10^6\), the function will consider all possible subsets and otherwise \(10^6\) random subsets. One can use the `subsets`

argument to specify a different number of subsets to consider. If `subsets`

is specified and it is actually larger than the number of possible subsets, then the function automatically only considers the possible subsets and does not use random subsets.

On machines with multiple cores, one can try to speed things up by delegating the model fitting to separate worker processes, that is, by setting `parallel="snow"`

or `parallel="multicore"`

and `ncpus`

to some value larger than 1. Parallel processing makes use of the `parallel`

package, using the `makePSOCKcluster`

and `parLapply`

functions when `parallel="snow"`

or using `mclapply`

when `parallel="multicore"`

(the latter only works on Unix/Linux-alikes). With `parallel::detectCores()`

, one can check on the number of available cores on the local machine.

An object of class `"gosh.rma"`

. The object is a list containing the following components:

a data frame with the results for each subset (various heterogeneity statistics and the model coefficient(s)).

a matrix indicating which studies were included in which subset.

some additional elements/values.

Wolfgang Viechtbauer wvb@metafor-project.org https://www.metafor-project.org

Olkin, I., Dahabreh, I. J., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2012). GOSH - a graphical display of study heterogeneity. *Research Synthesis Methods*, **3**(3), 214--223. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1053

Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. *Journal of Statistical Software*, **36**(3), 1--48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

Viechtbauer, W. (2021). Model checking in meta-analysis. In C. H. Schmid, T. Stijnen, & I. R. White (Eds.), *Handbook of meta-analysis* (pp. 219--254). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315119403

### calculate log odds ratios and corresponding sampling variances dat <- escalc(measure="OR", ai=ai, n1i=n1i, ci=ci, n2i=n2i, data=dat.egger2001) ### meta-analysis of all trials including ISIS-4 using a FE model res <- rma(yi, vi, data=dat, method="FE") ### fit FE model to all possible subsets (65535 models) # \dontrun{ sav <- gosh(res, progbar=FALSE) sav#> #> Model fits attempted: 65535 #> Model fits succeeded: 65535 #> #> mean min q1 median q3 max #> k 8.0001 1.0000 7.0000 8.0000 9.0000 16.0000 #> Q 16.2141 0.0000 8.6068 14.1750 23.9552 47.0593 #> I2 45.1552 0.0000 24.8066 52.5244 68.6902 87.5350 #> H2 2.2396 0.0000 1.3299 2.1063 3.1939 8.0225 #> estimate -0.3424 -2.4075 -0.5535 0.0148 0.0354 0.2231 #>### create GOSH plot ### red points for subsets that include and blue points ### for subsets that exclude study 16 (the ISIS-4 trial) plot(sav, out=16, breaks=100)# }