Results from 26 studies on the reliability of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS).

dat.demir2022

Format

The data frame contains the following columns:

studyidnumericstudy ID
esidnumericeffect size ID
authorcharacterauthor(s) of the study
yearnumericpublication year
pubtypecharacterpublication type (Article or Thesis)
countrycharactercountry
participantscharacterparticipant characteristics
nnumericsample size
alphanumericCronbach's alpha
itemsnumericnumber of items in the scale

Details

The Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS) is an 8-item Likert-type questionnaire to evaluate caregiver-infant attachment. Demir et al. (2022) carried out a meta-analysis of 26 studies (reporting 33 Cronbach's alpha values) to assess the reliability of the scale.

Source

Demir, E., Öz, S., Aral, N., & Gürsoy, F. (2022). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale. Psychological Reports, 127(1), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221114413

Concepts

psychology, Cronbach's alpha, reliability generalization

Examples

### copy data into 'dat' and examine data
dat <- dat.demir2022
dat
#>    studyid esid             author year pubtype         country                  participants    n
#> 1        1    1  Wittkowski et al. 2007 Article              UK             Postnatal mothers   98
#> 2        1    2  Wittkowski et al. 2007 Article              UK             Postnatal mothers   98
#> 3        2    3      Horsch et al. 2017 Article     Switzerland             Postnatal mothers  287
#> 4        3    4 Handelzalts et al. 2016 Article          Israel             Expectant mothers   33
#> 5        4    5       Ertan et al. 2021 Article          France             Postnatal mothers  916
#> 6        5    6       Eapen et al. 2014 Article       Australia             Expectant mothers  127
#> 7        6    7      Coktay et al. 2020 Article          Turkey             Postnatal mothers  335
#> 8        7    8            Mbabazi 2014  Thesis             USA             Postnatal mothers   89
#> 9        8    9            Calhoun 2015  Thesis             USA             Postnatal mothers  107
#> 10       9   10                Lim 2013  Thesis             USA             Postnatal mothers   13
#> 11      10   11       Suchy et al. 2020 Article             USA             Postnatal fathers   98
#> 12      11   12   Shreffler et al. 2021 Article             USA             Expectant mothers  177
#> 13      12   13  Stuijfzand et al. 2020 Article     Switzerland             Postnatal mothers  210
#> 14      12   14  Stuijfzand et al. 2020 Article     Switzerland             Postnatal mothers   91
#> 15      12   15  Stuijfzand et al. 2020 Article     Switzerland             Postnatal mothers  301
#> 16      13   16        Roth et al. 2021 Article             USA             Postnatal mothers  125
#> 17      14   17   Mendelson et al. 2018 Article             USA             Postnatal mothers   27
#> 18      15   18  Mayopoulos et al. 2021 Article             USA             Expectant mothers 2251
#> 19      16   19        Foli et al. 2013 Article             USA              Adoptive fathers   38
#> 20      17   20       South et al. 2012 Article             USA              Adoptive mothers  251
#> 21      18   21        Foli et al. 2012 Article             USA              Adoptive mothers  284
#> 22      19   22      Shorey et al. 2019 Article       Singapore Expectant mothers and fathers  236
#> 23      19   23      Shorey et al. 2019 Article       Singapore Postnatal mothers and fathers  210
#> 24      19   24      Shorey et al. 2019 Article       Singapore Postnatal mothers and fathers  194
#> 25      19   25      Shorey et al. 2019 Article       Singapore Postnatal mothers and fathers  186
#> 26      20   26        Foli et al. 2012 Article             USA             Postnatal mothers  113
#> 27      21   27   Tichelman et al. 2021 Article The Netherlands             Postnatal mothers 1528
#> 28      22   28             Escasa 2012  Thesis             USA             Postnatal mothers  260
#> 29      23   29      Taylor et al. 2005 Article              UK             Postnatal mothers  144
#> 30      24   30    Morelius et al. 2021 Article          Sweden             Postnatal mothers   63
#> 31      25   31  Van Bussel et al. 2010 Article         Belgium             Postnatal mothers  263
#> 32      25   32  Van Bussel et al. 2010 Article         Belgium             Postnatal mothers  202
#> 33      26   33    Shoemark et al. 2021 Article             USA             Postnatal mothers   18
#>    alpha items
#> 1   0.55     8
#> 2   0.49     8
#> 3   0.77     8
#> 4   0.63     8
#> 5   0.82     8
#> 6   0.91     8
#> 7   0.79     8
#> 8   0.77     8
#> 9   0.52     7
#> 10  0.92     8
#> 11  0.36     8
#> 12  0.71     8
#> 13  0.73     8
#> 14  0.73     8
#> 15  0.73     8
#> 16  0.76     8
#> 17  0.71     8
#> 18  0.78     8
#> 19  0.86     8
#> 20  0.90     8
#> 21  0.89     8
#> 22  0.70     8
#> 23  0.58     8
#> 24  0.66     8
#> 25  0.62     8
#> 26  0.89     8
#> 27  0.67     8
#> 28  0.69     8
#> 29  0.71     8
#> 30  0.68     8
#> 31  0.67     8
#> 32  0.58     8
#> 33  0.45     8

### load metafor package
library(metafor)

### transform the alpha values using the Bonett (2022) transformation
dat <- escalc(measure="ABT", ai=alpha, ni=n, mi=items, data=dat)
dat
#> 
#>    studyid esid             author year pubtype         country                  participants    n 
#> 1        1    1  Wittkowski et al. 2007 Article              UK             Postnatal mothers   98 
#> 2        1    2  Wittkowski et al. 2007 Article              UK             Postnatal mothers   98 
#> 3        2    3      Horsch et al. 2017 Article     Switzerland             Postnatal mothers  287 
#> 4        3    4 Handelzalts et al. 2016 Article          Israel             Expectant mothers   33 
#> 5        4    5       Ertan et al. 2021 Article          France             Postnatal mothers  916 
#> 6        5    6       Eapen et al. 2014 Article       Australia             Expectant mothers  127 
#> 7        6    7      Coktay et al. 2020 Article          Turkey             Postnatal mothers  335 
#> 8        7    8            Mbabazi 2014  Thesis             USA             Postnatal mothers   89 
#> 9        8    9            Calhoun 2015  Thesis             USA             Postnatal mothers  107 
#> 10       9   10                Lim 2013  Thesis             USA             Postnatal mothers   13 
#> 11      10   11       Suchy et al. 2020 Article             USA             Postnatal fathers   98 
#> 12      11   12   Shreffler et al. 2021 Article             USA             Expectant mothers  177 
#> 13      12   13  Stuijfzand et al. 2020 Article     Switzerland             Postnatal mothers  210 
#> 14      12   14  Stuijfzand et al. 2020 Article     Switzerland             Postnatal mothers   91 
#> 15      12   15  Stuijfzand et al. 2020 Article     Switzerland             Postnatal mothers  301 
#> 16      13   16        Roth et al. 2021 Article             USA             Postnatal mothers  125 
#> 17      14   17   Mendelson et al. 2018 Article             USA             Postnatal mothers   27 
#> 18      15   18  Mayopoulos et al. 2021 Article             USA             Expectant mothers 2251 
#> 19      16   19        Foli et al. 2013 Article             USA              Adoptive fathers   38 
#> 20      17   20       South et al. 2012 Article             USA              Adoptive mothers  251 
#> 21      18   21        Foli et al. 2012 Article             USA              Adoptive mothers  284 
#> 22      19   22      Shorey et al. 2019 Article       Singapore Expectant mothers and fathers  236 
#> 23      19   23      Shorey et al. 2019 Article       Singapore Postnatal mothers and fathers  210 
#> 24      19   24      Shorey et al. 2019 Article       Singapore Postnatal mothers and fathers  194 
#> 25      19   25      Shorey et al. 2019 Article       Singapore Postnatal mothers and fathers  186 
#> 26      20   26        Foli et al. 2012 Article             USA             Postnatal mothers  113 
#> 27      21   27   Tichelman et al. 2021 Article The Netherlands             Postnatal mothers 1528 
#> 28      22   28             Escasa 2012  Thesis             USA             Postnatal mothers  260 
#> 29      23   29      Taylor et al. 2005 Article              UK             Postnatal mothers  144 
#> 30      24   30    Morelius et al. 2021 Article          Sweden             Postnatal mothers   63 
#> 31      25   31  Van Bussel et al. 2010 Article         Belgium             Postnatal mothers  263 
#> 32      25   32  Van Bussel et al. 2010 Article         Belgium             Postnatal mothers  202 
#> 33      26   33    Shoemark et al. 2021 Article             USA             Postnatal mothers   18 
#>    alpha items     yi     vi 
#> 1   0.55     8 0.7985 0.0238 
#> 2   0.49     8 0.6733 0.0238 
#> 3   0.77     8 1.4697 0.0080 
#> 4   0.63     8 0.9943 0.0737 
#> 5   0.82     8 1.7148 0.0025 
#> 6   0.91     8 2.4079 0.0183 
#> 7   0.79     8 1.5606 0.0069 
#> 8   0.77     8 1.4697 0.0263 
#> 9   0.52     7 0.7340 0.0222 
#> 10  0.92     8 2.5257 0.2078 
#> 11  0.36     8 0.4463 0.0238 
#> 12  0.71     8 1.2379 0.0131 
#> 13  0.73     8 1.3093 0.0110 
#> 14  0.73     8 1.3093 0.0257 
#> 15  0.73     8 1.3093 0.0076 
#> 16  0.76     8 1.4271 0.0186 
#> 17  0.71     8 1.2379 0.0914 
#> 18  0.78     8 1.5141 0.0010 
#> 19  0.86     8 1.9661 0.0635 
#> 20  0.90     8 2.3026 0.0092 
#> 21  0.89     8 2.2073 0.0081 
#> 22  0.70     8 1.2040 0.0098 
#> 23  0.58     8 0.8675 0.0110 
#> 24  0.66     8 1.0788 0.0119 
#> 25  0.62     8 0.9676 0.0124 
#> 26  0.89     8 2.2073 0.0206 
#> 27  0.67     8 1.1087 0.0015 
#> 28  0.69     8 1.1712 0.0089 
#> 29  0.71     8 1.2379 0.0161 
#> 30  0.68     8 1.1394 0.0375 
#> 31  0.67     8 1.1087 0.0088 
#> 32  0.58     8 0.8675 0.0114 
#> 33  0.45     8 0.5978 0.1429 
#> 

### meta-analysis using a random-effects model
res <- rma(yi, vi, data=dat)
res
#> 
#> Random-Effects Model (k = 33; tau^2 estimator: REML)
#> 
#> tau^2 (estimated amount of total heterogeneity): 0.2318 (SE = 0.0637)
#> tau (square root of estimated tau^2 value):      0.4814
#> I^2 (total heterogeneity / total variability):   96.34%
#> H^2 (total variability / sampling variability):  27.36
#> 
#> Test for Heterogeneity:
#> Q(df = 32) = 584.8126, p-val < .0001
#> 
#> Model Results:
#> 
#> estimate      se     zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub      
#>   1.3331  0.0882  15.1193  <.0001  1.1603  1.5059  *** 
#> 
#> ---
#> Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
#> 

### back-transform the results
predict(res, transf=transf.iabt, digits=2)
#> 
#>  pred ci.lb ci.ub pi.lb pi.ub 
#>  0.74  0.69  0.78  0.31  0.90 
#>